I don’t drink alcohol. It’s a personal decision I made many many years ago and I’m proud of that. Yes, I know what it tastes like and that’s one of the reasons I don’t drink it. I am not against other people drinking if that’s what they want to do. I think it’s important that I say that right out of the gate. With that being said, I am biased when I discuss the consumption of alcoholic beverages, especially the overindulgence of alcohol by young people.
I saw a story about underage drinking that made me take notice. It had my attention from the first few seconds. Not because it was shocking that it happened, but captivating due to the level of stupidity and irresponsibility surrounding the incidents. It was outright ludicrous.
A CBS Washington, D.C., News affiliate did a weeklong report on underage drinking in the suburbs and there was huge fallout from the teenagers involved and their parents. People took to the Facebook page of the news station and to Twitter to express their outrage at being exposed for engaging in this illegal activity. Andrea McCarren, the reporter who covered the story, was forced off the air after she and her family were threatened.
The news report exposed minors purchasing alcohol, no identification necessary, at a market in Northwest Washington. The storeowner was confronted about breaking the law two months prior and D.C. police were notified, but neither took any action.
The messages on social networking got worse after McCarren reported on a police raid of an underage drinking party hosted by some parents. The parents arriving to pick up their kids seemed to be upset with the police, but okay with their kids consuming alcohol. You could hear a woman asking, “Why are there cameras following these kids?” A police officer replied, “Because they are with us, ma’am.” The parent responded, “I was told they were with the news.” The outrage that followed wasn’t misdirected if you consider that most of those parents knew exactly what their kids were up to when they allowed them to attend the party. Contrary to the parents’ concerns about the cameras, the teenagers were not identified in the news piece.
A father that arrived for his son asked the teen right in front of the police, “Why didn’t he run?” Can this be called parenting, seriously? I wonder if these parents are just so messed up from some traumatic experience in their early years they don’t completely understand responsibility or if they think breaking the law is okay for them and their families. The teens are behaving like brats and posting hateful and threatening messages online to a reporter and news organization for everyone to read because they think it’s appropriate. The parents have set no limitations. If this doesn’t reek of a sense of entitlement gone off the deep end I don’t know what does.
How does the conversation start between parents with teens about having an adult supervised illegal drinking party? Do they have a drinking party themselves and pull straws, shortest straw wins? Are they so dense that they think this is the road that leads to being best friends with the teens they are supposed to be parenting? Do they seriously believe that the teens are only going to drink in supervised situations because they allow them to go to a “supervised” illegal drinking party? Do the parents believe they are being responsible by driving their teens to and from the party? If so, they couldn’t be more wrong because the entire process is negligent. I’m not sure what they are thinking, but doing some research about underage drinking would do them a lot of good. They would know that a report from The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse finds that half of college students binge drink and abuse prescription and illegal drugs. Nancy Kaufman, vice president of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation states, “Nearly half of all teen automobile crashes are a result of drinking. It also contributes to suicides, homicides and fatal injuries, and is a factor in sexual assaults and date rapes.” Maybe this kind of information would make them think twice about giving their teenage children a head start down a path that could be disastrous.
Parents that allow their teens to attend illegal drinking parties say they are doing it to teach the teens about responsible drinking. I would like to know their definition of responsible drinking. The law states the legal drinking age in the United States is 21 years old. Also, how responsible is it to say you are teaching teens about responsible drinking while at the same time you are teaching them that laws don’t matter, at least for them. What’s next? Where do you draw the line, introduction to weed or sex, or is that the same party?
I’ve heard about stories of parent-sponsored booze fests before and they all end with parents denying they are doing anything wrong. After all, it’s their child and they know what’s best, even if it means turning away from responsibility and leaving their kids to make adult decisions. People under the age of 21 have dramatically impaired judgment and lack physical and psychological maturity. So, when parents take this approach it is a copout and lack of moral backbone.
The good part of this story is the majority of feedback was supportive of the reporter exposing the underage drinking and the facilitating parents in their area. So all is not lost on society.
Why do you think parents feel it’s acceptable to allow teens to drink?
Watch the story courtesy of CBS News:
© 2012, CherylNation. All rights reserved.
{ 0 comments }








